COMPLETE SCHOOL PROJECT TOPICS & MATERIALS :
CHAPTERS: Chapter 1-5
|
DOC FORMAT: MS WORD/PDF
|
PRICE: ₦5,000
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND OF STUDY
Human behaviour is enormously varied and very complex and is predicted on attitude, learning and habit. Consumers learn from past experience and future behaviour is conditioned by such learning. Marketers, the world over differ considerably in their prediction of human behaviour.
The whole marketing effort is generally centered on the consumers. This is implied in the marketing concept echoed by most markets which is consumer satisfaction at a profit as the basis for successful marketing. In their varied description of consumers as Theodore Levit (1960) puts it, some people described consumers as unpredictable, varied, fickle, stupid, shortsighted, stubborn and generally bothersome.
This does not however, in any way make the consumers less important. Therefore the consumer is still of utmost consideration in the planning of the marketing mix or any other marketing effort. Product branding is one of such marketing effort. Products are branded for many reasons, one of which is identification of the products. Today most of the products are purchased under some particular brand. This contrast with what obtained when products were once considered simply as commodities in the early days of marketing. Commodities or goods are differentiated only by their uses and not by their suppliers. Today’s marketers recognize that the total product is greater than simply the physical good itself and believe that all goods and service can be distinguished by their own unique qualities.
A products brand carries good deal of information, reducing or eliminating the need to find out about a product before buying it. Consumers confronted with a familiars brand have information about the products images as promoted by the company. Even products that are very similar are now considered distinguishable by brand. Consumer’s perceptions of different brands of various product categories determine to a large extent their buying pattern. However O’Shaughnessy, John (1988) comments on the above claim that “different brands bought at different times could reflect different occasions, temporary changes in taste or family or wants rather than picking from a repertoire of brands with indifference as to which brand is bought. Complete acceptance of what O’shaushnessy advanced is accepting that their is no brand loyalty.
If indeed, there is no brand loyalty, in the buying pattern of consumers, then one of the main purpose of branding is defeated.
Other researchers are of the view that consumers gain experience in purchasing and consuming products, they learn what brands they like and do not like and the features they like most in particular brands. The consumers adjust purchase behaviors based on past experience. The existence of brand loyalty among consumers of a product or nonexistence of it thereof could depend on the extent of consumers covered, the product under consideration and the approach employed in the search for this important consideration is product marketing.
This study seeks to find out the existence or non existence of brand loyalty among the consumer of cereal foods. The researcher is aware of the fact that brand loyalty is an exhibition of consumer’s attitude to products which is some what difficult to measure. However it is believed that just as David Relbstein (1985) puts it, the buying pattern of the product, and the proportion of purchase a particular brand bought are indications of brand loyalty.
1.2 STATEMENT OF PROBLEM
The cereal foods industry in the country is experiencing a continuous increase in the number of brands competing for consumers income. From the record of importation of white oat, fruit and fiber in the early sixties as the only food cereals in the country, there has been a continual increase in the number of cereal foods in the country. Today there are no less than six different brands of cereal foods available in the market.
In those early days the beverage market was the seller’s market. Initially it was white oat is the leading brand. But because it was imported as a wholly finished product, it lost its position to corn flakes following the ban placed on the importation of beverages at the beginning of the Nigeria Civil war in 1967.
Corn flakes, the product of NASCO foods Nigeria PLC, dominated the market for a long time. Consumers were multiplying, buying more of the brand. However, more firms have continued to enter the market with local plants each producing different brands of instant cereal foods. It is therefore unrealistic for any company to rest on a mere assumption of market leadership without considering the changing market share. In today’s factored market place, things like branding products and markets share for instance no longer guarantee loyal customer. In one case after another, the old established brands have been supplemented by the rise of other brands. No single company can claim largest share of any product market in a competitive environment. These days, the idea of market share is a trap that can lull business people into a false sense of security. Managers should wake up every morning uncertain about the market place because it is invariably changing. Companies should however not be caught in the excitement of selling things just to increase their market share. As Regis Mckenna (1991) puts its, the real goal of marketing is to own the market, not just to make or sell products. Smart marketing means defining what of the whole pie is yours. This is not just an issue of defining your market share. The company should rather be sure what share of the market is loyal to their product(s). Stopping at the idea of market share “turns marketing into an expensive fight over crumbs rather than a smart effort to own the whole pie.
Owning the market demands some responsibilities such as bringing into your camp third parties who want to develop their own products, or offer new features or add-ons to argument your product. You get the first look at new ideas that others are testing in the market, you attract the most talented people because of your acknowledge leadership position. This is why it has become necessary to investigate the existence or otherwise of brand loyalty among the consumers of cereal foods drink in Enugu metropolis.
1.3 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
The research is basically directed towards the investigation of an existence of brand loyalty among consumers of cereal foods. To this end, therefore, the objectives of the study are to seek and possibly find solutions to the problems identified above, the extent and basis of consumer loyalty.
- To determine the existence and extent of brand loyalty among consumers of cereal foods drinks.
- To determine the influence of price of the products on brand loyalty.
To determine the extent consumers perception of the attributes of the cereal food drinks influence brand loyalty for particular brands. Attributes includes such things are:
i.Taste
ii. Milk content
iii. Sugar content
iv. Dissolvability
v. Nutritional value
4.To ascertain the extent company image and brand name influence brand loyalty.
RESEARCH QUESTIONS
Based on the research objectives, we shall face with the following questions:
- Does the consumer of cereal foods drink in Enugu metropolis loyal to particular brands?
- To what extent does price of the brands influence loyalty to a particular brand?
- Does consumers’ perception of attributes or quality of the brands influence loyalty?
- What roles does company image and brand name play in the promotion of loyalty to particular brands?
1.5 HYPOTHESIS
The rationale behind this research was to determine the existence of brand loyalty among consumers of cereal foods in Enugu metropolis. For this reason, therefore the following hypotheses were made.
- Ho: Cereal foods consumers are loyal to particular brands. Hi: Consumers of cereal foods are not loyal to particular brands.
- Ho: Price is an important influence in the choice product brand loyalty. Hi: price is not an important influence in the choice product brand loyalty
- Ho: Company image and brand name contribute significantly to consumers’ loyalty to particular brands. Hi: Company image and brand name do not contribute significantly to consumers’ loyalty to particular brands.
- Ho: Consumers perceptions of the quality of the food drinks have significant impact on brand loyalty. Hi: Consumers perceptions of the quality of the food drinks have no significant impact on brand loyalty.