COMPLETE SCHOOL PROJECT TOPICS & MATERIALS :
CHAPTERS: Chapter 1-5 | DOC FORMAT: MS WORD/PDF | PRICE: ₦5,000

GET COMPLETE WORK

ELECTRICITY TARIFF HIKE AND SMALL BUSINESS SURVIVAL IN NIGERIA: IMPACT ON INCOME AND LIVING STANDARDS OF TRADERS IN ONITSHA MAIN MARKET

CHAPTER ONE

INTRODUCTION

Abstract

The electricity tariff adjustment introduced in April 2024 resulted in a substantial increase in energy costs for Band A consumers in Nigeria, with rates rising from ₦68 to over ₦225 per kWh. This policy change has had profound consequences for small-scale enterprises, particularly evident in Onitsha Main Market, which serves as a critical economic hub for more than 24,000 traders. The market, recognized as Africa’s largest open-air commercial center, has experienced significant operational challenges since the tariff implementation, including a pronounced reduction in daily revenue streams and numerous business closures. An analysis of the tariff’s socioeconomic effects reveals substantial impacts on trader livelihoods. The typical monthly electricity expenditure for small commercial units escalated from ₦8,400 to ₦28,700, compelling most market operators to implement cost-cutting measures. These included significant reductions in operating schedules and workforce reductions, particularly affecting family-based support staff. The broader economic consequences encompassed diminished purchasing power, heightened vulnerability to food insecurity, and increased reliance on child labor among affected households. Methodologically, this investigation draws upon comprehensive market records, detailed trader financial documentation, and household economic surveys. The findings indicate severe erosion of real income levels and deterioration in quality of life indicators among the market population. In response to these findings, the study advances a proposed intervention framework focused on sustainable energy solutions and financial support mechanisms. The projected outcomes of such an intervention suggest measurable improvements in economic resilience for the market’s extensive dependent population.

1.1 Background of the Study

Onitsha Main Market in Anambra State represents West Africa’s largest commercial center, with annual trade exceeding ₦124 billion. Registered shops primarily engage in sectors such as electronics, textiles, auto parts, and general consumer goods, as documented by the Anambra State Ministry of Commerce (2025). Energy reliance within the market is nearly universal, with 92% of shops dependent on electricity for essential operations including lighting, refrigeration, and powering machinery. Prior to the 2024 tariff adjustment, medium-sized outlets averaged 847 kWh monthly consumption, according to data from the Onitsha Main Market Traders Association (2025).

The Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC) implemented a substantial tariff revision in April 2024, increasing rates by 240% for Band A consumers. This adjustment elevated prices from ₦68 to ₦225 per kWh for users theoretically receiving at least 20 hours of daily supply. However, grid instability in Onitsha resulted in actual delivery averaging only 12.4 hours, as reported by NERC (2024). While the policy successfully reduced government subsidies by 35%, it precipitated immediate operational disruptions for small enterprises. Electricity expenditures surged from 9% to 28% of monthly operating costs, creating significant financial strain (Obegolu, 2025; Okafor & Eze, 2024).

Market traders, predominantly Igbo family-run businesses, face heightened economic fragility. An electronics retailer previously allocating ₦8,400 monthly to electricity expenses now confronts bills exceeding ₦28,700, consuming 41% of an average ₦70,000 monthly profit (BusinessDay, 2025). During power interruptions, reliance on diesel generators at ₦1,200 per hour has compelled 67% of traders to curtail operating hours from 14 to 9.8 daily (Ibrahim & Musa, 2025).

This situation reflects Nigeria’s chronic energy challenges, where 85 million citizens lack grid connectivity and connected users experience 4,700 annual outage hours (World Bank, 2024). Onitsha’s commercial ecosystem has deteriorated significantly, with 28% of shops closing since May 2024 and 39% reducing staff. Consumer behavior shifts toward digital platforms have precipitated a 52% income decline (Adebayo & Ogunleye, 2025). Household welfare consequences include 34% of trader families experiencing food insecurity, a 27% rise in child labor participation, and 18% school abandonment rates as families seek supplemental income (Ezeani & Okonkwo, 2024).

Theoretical perspectives illuminate these dynamics. Resource Dependence Theory demonstrates how external energy cost fluctuations undermine business autonomy and financial sustainability (Pfeffer & Salancik, 1978; Oluwatayo & Adebayo, 2024). The Livelihoods Approach delineates sequential asset depletion patterns: operational hour reductions precipitate income contraction, necessitating household consumption adjustments and ultimately child labor mobilization (DFID, 1999; Kalu & Eze, 2025). Policy interventions, including NERC’s embedded generation initiatives and Anambra State’s ₦2.8 billion trader assistance program, have proven inadequate, reaching merely 12% of affected businesses (Anambra State Government, 2025).

1.2 Statement of the Problem

The 2024 electricity tariff increase has significantly undermined the financial viability of small businesses operating within Onitsha Main Market. Research indicates that monthly energy expenditures now account for between 28% and 41% of total revenues, precipitating the closure of 28% of shops within an 18-month period (BusinessDay, 2025; Obegolu, 2025). Traders, whose profit margins historically ranged from 12% to 18%, now confront severe trade-offs between meeting operational expenses, maintaining inventory levels, and providing for household needs. These constraints have contributed to a 52% reduction in real incomes and a 39% contraction in workforce size.

The socioeconomic consequences manifest across several dimensions. Reduced operating hours, adopted by 67% of businesses, have resulted in a 34% decline in customer patronage. Average daily earnings have deteriorated from ₦12,400 to ₦5,800, exacerbating household vulnerabilities. This economic pressure has increased food insecurity among 34% of trader households, compelled 27% to rely on child labor, and forced 18% to withdraw children from educational institutions. The broader market ecosystem has sustained damage, with 41% of suppliers defaulting due to diminished order volumes.

Regulatory shortcomings have intensified these challenges. The Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission’s commitment to provide 20 hours of daily power supply has failed to materialize, with actual availability averaging 12.4 hours (NERC, 2024; Okafor & Eze, 2024). This deficit necessitates generator usage at ₦1,200 per hour, consuming 68% of remaining profits. Absent targeted policy interventions, the Onitsha economic zone which sustains approximately 1.2 million residents faces prospects of irreversible socioeconomic deterioration.

The research yields significant implications extending well beyond the immediate trading context of Onitsha Main Market. As the first scholarly examination of market-specific dynamics, it systematically demonstrates how singular utility price shocks can induce cascading economic collapse across informal commercial ecosystems, systems supporting over 1.2 million livelihoods in Anambra State alone. Through rigorous causal analysis linking electricity tariff escalation to trader profitability erosion, the study provides empirical justification for targeted relief measures that could avert systemic failure among southeastern Nigeria’s micro-enterprise networks.

1.3 Objectives of the Study

General Objective To examine the impact of the 2024 electricity tariff hike on small business survival, trader income, and household living standards in Onitsha Main Market.

Specific Objectives

1. To quantify changes in business operating costs and revenues pre- and post-tariff hike
2. To analyze effects on trader household budgets, food security, and education access
3. To identify coping strategies and propose sustainable energy relief interventions

1.4 Research Questions

1. How has the tariff hike altered business costs and revenues for Onitsha traders?
2. What are the effects on household income, food security, and child education?
3. Which coping mechanisms are most common, and what interventions can mitigate impacts?

1.5 Research Hypotheses

H₀₁: Tariff hike has no significant effect on business revenues in Onitsha Market H₀₂: Increased energy costs show no correlation with household food insecurity H₀₃: Trader coping strategies have no impact on living standard decline

1.6 Significance of the Study

The findings disrupt national policy assumptions by revealing how tariff rationalization disproportionately burdens small-scale traders a demographic whose aggregate economic contribution exceeds most formal manufacturing sectors. This evidence substantiates calls for differentiated tariff structures accounting for the precarity of margin-dependent market enterprises. The developed Onitsha Market Energy Relief Framework presents a scalable intervention model potentially applicable across Nigeria’s extensive market networks.

For international development actors, the research demonstrates how strategic energy subsidies or solar energy financing in commercial clusters can generate substantial socioeconomic returns through poverty mitigation and human capital preservation particularly evident in the documented 27% increase in educational discontinuities following tariff hikes. These insights position energy access as fundamental to integrated economic planning.

The study advances academic discourse by elucidating energy poverty transmission mechanisms within capital-constrained informal economies, employing innovative methodological triangulation of energy expenditure tracking and trader income trajectories. Most critically, it amplifies historically marginalized voices in policy debates, foregrounding the lived realities of market traders disproportionately women balancing enterprise and household survival thereby challenging orthodox approaches to energy sector reform.

1.7 Scope and Delimitation

The investigation concentrates its analytical lens on the 24,700 registered trading enterprises within Onitsha Main Market’s physical boundaries, capturing the full spectrum from single-person stalls to multi-branch wholesale operations across its eight major sections Main Market, Bridge Head Drug Market, Electronics International Market, and New Spare Parts Market. This geographic specificity enables granular examination of how electricity dependency varies by product category (perishable goods requiring constant refrigeration versus dry goods with minimal power needs) while maintaining sufficient scale to draw broader conclusions about market-based enterprises nationwide.

1.8 Definition of Key Terms

Electricity Tariff Hike: 2024 NERC increase from ₦68 to ₦225/kWh for Band A

Small Business Survival: Ability to maintain operations without closure

Household Budgets: Monthly income-expenditure allocation

Living Standards: Food security, education access, health outcomes

References

Adebayo, R. A., & Ogunleye, T. S. (2025). Energy costs and SME performance in Nigeria. African Journal of Business Management, 19(1), 45–62.

Afolabi, O. S., & Musa, A. S. (2025). Tariff shocks and household welfare in urban markets. Journal of Development Economics, 158, 102934.

Ezeani, C. O., & Okonkwo, P. N. (2024). Electricity pricing and informal economy resilience. Energy Policy, 184, 113845.

Ibrahim, M. U., & Eze, P. C. (2025). Power sector reforms and small business adaptation. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 15(2), 123–141.

Kalu, B. C., & Eze, O. M. (2025). Coping strategies in energy crisis: Nigerian traders’ responses. Journal of African Economies, 34(3), 289–306.

Okafor, E. E., & Eze, C. O. (2024). Tariff hikes and market trader profitability. Business Day Africa, 15(4), 78–95.

Obegolu, E. (2025). Electricity tariffs and SME survival in Nigeria. De King Foundation Journal, 2(1), 12–28.

Oluwatayo, I. B., & Adebayo, R. A. (2024). Economic shocks and household living standards. Journal of Economic Studies, 51(5), 678–695.